9 Evaluation and Analysis



10.1055/b-0035-121687

9 Evaluation and Analysis



9.1 Visual Inspection


Visual inspection of the patient is done to evaluate the face and external nose. Questions of overall assessment are paramount: Are there gnathic abnormalities? Is there significant facial asymmetry or facial scoliosis? Is the nose over- or underprojected? In making these determinations, the surgeon relies not just on classic facial geometry formulas but also on his or her aesthetic sense ( Fig. 9.1 ). 1

Fig. 9.1 (a) Measured by reference lines, a nose may be too short, too long, or too broad for the face. (b) Straight nose with asymmetric brow-tip aesthetic lines creates the impression of a crooked nose. (c) Bony crooked nose with distortion of the philtrum and true axial deviation to the right. (d) The nose appears too wide in a narrow face. This is only an impression and is not measurable.

Does the nose look too long, too short, too broad, or too narrow? Does it distract from the attractiveness of the eyes? In previously operated cases, does the current nose fit the patient′s face or personality? Once these determinations have been made, attention is directed toward local findings in the external nose. We have had good experience with photographing rhinoplasty candidates on their initial visit, then using modern graphic software to jointly analyze the photo on the computer screen and simulate possible changes ( Fig. 9.2 ). This process generates sketches, diagrams, and interview notes that document both the findings and the consultation and will ultimately direct surgical planning.

Fig. 9.2 The potential results of a revision rhinoplasty are simulated by computer animation during a consultation visit.


9.2 Palpation


Visual inspection is followed by palpation. But before touching the nose, the surgeon should tell the patient that only palpation can supply essential information on the tension and elasticity of the various structural components of the nose. 2 , 3 Some problems are easier to palpate than to see ( Fig. 9.3 ). There are five areas in which palpable findings are particularly important:




  1. The nasal dorsum. The junction of the bony and cartilaginous nasal dorsum is palpated to detect any roughness, irregularities, appositional bone growth after previous surgery, or an open roof.



  2. Protection. Finger pressure is applied to the nasal tip and anterior septal angle to assess tip and supratip recoil, which will indicate the quality of protection in both areas. The height and tension of the anterior septal cartilage can be assessed over the anterior septal angle.



  3. Length of the nasal bones. The relationship of the bony and cartilaginous portions of the nasal pyramid will influence surgical planning. Short nasal bones, or a short nasal pyramid, are a frequent indication for the use of spreader grafts.



  4. The nasal vestibule. The shape and tension of the anterior septum and the size of the nasal spine and premaxilla can be assessed by palpation.



  5. The alar cartilages. The shape, size, and elasticity of the alar cartilages can be assessed by bimanual palpation.

Fig. 9.3 Palpation of the nose. (a) Bimanual palpation of the bony and cartilaginous nasal dorsum to assess elasticity, skin thickness and texture, irregularities, bony boundaries and to detect a possible open roof. (b) The tip recoil maneuver is a useful indicator of tip support (arrow). The anterior septal angle is palpated to assess the size and tension of the anterior septum. (c) Exploring the length and strength of the bony nasal pyramid. The relationship of the bony and cartilaginous portions is particularly important. (d) Palpation of the caudal septum, vestibules, and nasal spine. The surgeon gains information on the tension, width, and strength of the anterior septum; the size and shape of the nasal spine; and the tension of the medial crura, the membranous septum, and the footplates. (e) Bi-digital evaluation of the shape, size, and elasticity of the upper and lower cartilages, especially the cephalic and caudal edges.


9.3 Nasal Endoscopy


Nasal endoscopy is useful for detecting any intranasal pathology. 4 , 5 A logical, consistent routine should be followed to ensure complete and systematic coverage ( Fig. 9.4 ). With endoscopy, the examiner can explore the internal anatomy of the nose and evaluate the lateral nasal wall, the “sluice” leading to the para-nasal sinuses, and the general appearance of the nasal mucosa. 6 The mucosa is scrutinized for mucous or pus tracks, edema, and polyps. The function of the internal and external nasal valves during inspiration and expiration can also be assessed endoscopically ( Fig. 9.4 ).

Fig. 9.4 Algorithm for systematic endoscopic exploration of the nose.

Algorithm for nasal endoscopy ( Fig. 9.5 ):




  1. Start with a 0° scope 3 or 4 mm in diameter. Advance the endoscope over the nasal floor to the choana. The inferior turbinate, caudal nasal septum, choana, and pharyngeal tubal orifice can be visualized in the same sagittal plane as the posterior extension of the inferior turbinate ( Fig. 9.5 ).



  2. Retract the endoscope to inspect the nasal vestibule and valve area during normal and forced inspiration and expiration. The middle meatus is visualized.



  3. Switch to a 30° or 45° scope with a 3- or 4-mm diameter. Advance the endoscope with the field of view directed upward, passing beneath the middle meatus. Inspect the sphenoethmoid recess and the sphenoid sinus ostium. Look into the olfactory rim. Angle laterally after passing the choana. Tell the patient to swallow, and evaluate the opening mechanism of the eustachian tube.



  4. Withdraw the endoscope and evaluate the inferior meatus with the orifice of the nasolacrimal duct several millimeters behind the head of the inferior turbinate.

Fig. 9.5 Typical key areas in nasal endoscopy: (a) View from the vestibule into the nasal cavity. The examiner assesses the inferior and middle turbinates, the position of the septum, the nasal valve, and mucosal color and congestion. (b) View into the middle meatus, the “bellwether” of the paranasal sinuses. Possible findings include mucous and pus tracks, edema, polyps, or tumors. (c) View into the choana with the pharyngeal tubal orifice. The opening mechanism of the tube is observed during swallowing. (d) The nasal valve area is evaluated at rest and during forced inspiration.


9.4 Function Testing



9.4.1 Computed Rhinomanometry


Computer-assisted rhinomanometry can provide objective evidence for the subjective feeling of obstructed nasal breathing. The principle involves the synchronous recording of the pressure differential (D∆) between the nasal vestibule and choana (measured in pascal, Pa) and the airflow (V) measured in cubic centimeters per second ( Fig. 9.6 ). 7 10 An improved technique called four-phase rhinomanometry determines not only intranasal pressure and flow at 150 Pa but also the log peak resistance (log VR) and log effective resistance (log Reff) for the quantitative analysis of nasal obstruction. 11 In practice, active anterior rhinomanometry with a decongestion test (using decongestant nose drops) is most commonly used in selecting patients for nasal surgery. The test aids in differentiating stenosis with an anatomical cause from dynamic stenosis (mucosal disease, hyperreactivity) and pseudostenosis (e.g., in rhinitis sicca) ( Fig. 9.6 ).

Fig. 9.6 Four-phase rhinomanometry, illustrated in a patient with septal deviation. Right side: high flow at low pressure. Left side: limited. Open loops indicate a movable nasal vestibule (“nasal valve phenomenon”). The distance between the plots for the first and second measurements (green area) represents the contribution of the mucosa to total airway resistance. (b) Level of nasal obstruction.


9.4.2 Acoustic Rhinometry


Acoustic rhinometry determines cross-sectional areas in the nasal cavity by analyzing the reflections from an acoustic signal introduced into the nose. 12 By generating a graph of nasal cross-sectional areas at different distances from the nostril, acoustic rhinometry can accurately map the internal geometry of the nasal cavity. This test is not as widely used in practice as computed rhinomanometry, however.



9.4.3 Olfactometry


Subjective and objective tests are available for the assessment of olfactory performance. Sniffin’ Sticks is a standard test that is widely used in dysosmia patients. The cap is removed from the pen-like dispensing device, and the pen is held under the patient′s nose for 3 second Several types of odorants are used:




  • Pure odorants: cinnamon, lavender, vanilla, peppermint oil, turpentine



  • Odorants with a trigeminal component: ammonia, acetic acid



  • Odorants with a gustatory component: pyridine, chloroform


An olfactory test consists of three parts:




  1. Screening identification test. The patient is presented with different suprathreshold odorants and must choose one odorant from among four possible answers.



  2. More detailed threshold and discrimination test. In the threshold test, the patient is presented with 16 odor triplets. Each triplet consists of two odorless pens and one pen with n-butanol in 16 different concentrations (n-butanol has a characteristic pungent smell). The object is to determine the threshold of odor detection, i.e., the concentration at which the patient can smell something.



  3. Discrimination test. The patient is presented with 16 different sets of suprathreshold odor triplets, two identical and one different. The patient must identify the one that is different.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 9, 2020 | Posted by in OTOLARYNGOLOGY | Comments Off on 9 Evaluation and Analysis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access